Search for: "Discord, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
The apple for the day, just to be sure you keep the doctor away, is Apple Inc v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm by Eric Guttag
The alleged infringing terminal emulator program called “NewLook” was developed in Australia (by Looksoftware Proprietary Limited) but was sold by Lansa, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:33 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
" This raises the question - not easily solved - of whether an employee who has the ability to access corporate information, but who intends to misuse it, really has violated the CFAA at all.The case of American Furukawa, Inc. v. [read post]
The MCC mandates that political parties and candidates refrain from activities that foster societal discord, opting instead for constructive criticism of opponents’ policies. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 10:46 pm
" Marc Ostrofsky, president of Internet REIT Inc., a Houston domain-names investor, feels mistreated, too. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:45 am by AIPLA
The Impact of the CAFC’s Joint Infringement Conundrum on Protecting Interactive TechnologiesThe conundrum created by the Federal Circuit’s joint infringement doctrine and its impact on protecting interactive computer-based technologies got worse last week with McKesson Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm by NARF
Decades of discord: The Crow Tribe's ongoing fight for hunting rights in the Bighorn National Forest. [read post]
(which operates the video service TikTok), Discord Inc., Facebook, Inc., Reddit, Inc., Snap Inc., Twitter, Inc., WhatsApp Inc., and YouTube LLC. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:02 am
The nine companies—Amazon.com, Inc., ByteDance Ltd., Discord Inc., Facebook, Inc., Reddit, Inc., Snap Inc., Twitter, Inc., WhatsApp Inc., and YouTube LLC—were given a 45-day deadline to respond. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:00 am by Mark Tabakman
 The downside is that there will be fights over good “stations” and other possible employee discord/unrest. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am by Dan Hepburn
Top Line Industries Inc., 1995 BCCA 2305 (“Top Line”) resulted in the enactment of section 73.1, which modified the effect of section 73. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Textron, Inc., 369 F.3d 1, 6–7 (1st Cir.2004) (expressing hesitance to apply a “hard-and-fast rule” in an ERISA fiduciary duty cases, and instead noting the importance of record development of the facts). [read post]